-
Current technology node is
0.18
m
m
and there is a move to
0.13mm
underway.
-
The size of the circuits also continues to increase.
-
Besides increasing the number of devices, scaling has had a profound impact on both speed and power.
-
Full scaling
(
Constant Electrical Field Scaling
)
-
In the ideal model, all the dimensions of the MOS devices, e.g., the voltage supply level and depletion widths are scaled by the same factor
S
.
-
Keeping the electric field patterns constant avoids breakdown and other secondary effects.
-
This leads to greater device density, higher speed and reduced power consumption.
-
Performance is improved because of the
reduced capacitance
and
reduced voltage swing
.
-
Circuit speed increases linearly while the power-delay product is reduced in a cubic fashion!
-
Both clearly indicate the benefits of scaling.
Parameter
|
Relation
|
Full Scaling
|
General Scaling
|
Fixed-V Scaling
|
W, L, tox
|
|
1/S
|
1/S
|
1/S
|
VDD, VT
|
|
1/S
|
1/U
|
1
|
NSUB
|
V/Wdepl2
|
S
|
S2/U
|
S2
|
Area/Device
|
WL
|
1/S2
|
1/S2
|
1/S2
|
Cox
|
1/tox
|
S
|
S
|
S
|
CL
|
CoxWL
|
1/S
|
1/S
|
1/S
|
kn, kp
|
CoxW/L
|
S
|
S
|
S
|
Iav
|
kn,pV2
|
1/S
|
S/U2
|
S
|
Jav
|
Iav/Area
|
S
|
S3/U2
|
S3
|
tp(intrinsic)
|
CLV/Iav
|
1/S
|
U/S2
|
1/S2
|
Pav
|
CLV2/tp
|
1/S2
|
S/U3
|
S
|
PDP
|
CLV2
|
1/S3
|
1/SU2
|
1/S
|
-
See text for assumption used to derive this table.
-
Dimensions are scaled by
S
while voltages are scaled by
U
.
-
Full scaling
is not a feasible option.
-
For example, to keep new chips compatible with existing chips, voltages cannot be scaled arbitrarily.
-
Providing multiple voltage supplies is expensive.
-
5V was used up through the mid 90s.
-
Recently we've seen voltages of 3.3, 3.0 and 1.5 used internally.
-
Plus, some device voltages, e.g.,
silicon bandgap
and
built-in junction potential
, are material parameters and cannot be scaled.
-
Finally, V
T
scaling is limited since making it too low makes it difficult to turn off the devices completely.
-
This is aggravated by large process variations.
-
A more general scaling model is needed, where
dimensions
and
voltages
are scaled independently.
-
General Scaling
-
Device dimensions are scaled by a factor
S
while voltages are scaled by a factor
U
.
-
Under constant voltage scaling,
U = 1
as shown in the last column of the table.
-
Under this model, currents are increased by a factor of
S
.
-
This results in a rather impressive speed-up (1/
S
2
) at the expense of increased power consumption (
S
).
-
Note that this model ignores a number of second-order effects, e.g.,
-
Mobility degreadation, velocity saturation, drain-induced barrier lowering and series resistances.
-
The effects of
velocity saturation
can be significant.
Parameter
|
Relation
|
Full Scaling
|
General Scaling
|
Fixed-V Scaling
|
Iav
|
CoxWV
|
1/S
|
1/U
|
1
|
Jav
|
Iav/Area
|
S
|
S2/U
|
S2
|
tp(intrinsic)
|
CLV/Iav
|
1/S
|
1/S
|
1/S
|
Pav
|
CLV2/tp
|
1/S2
|
1/U2
|
1
|
-
Reduces voltage dependency of I
av
from
quadratic
to
linear
.
-
The decrease in propagation delay with
S
is not as large as predicted by previous table.